bmntleys9的部落格

If you are inquiring for telecasting drama near a medical centre ambience, here are relatively one options. At least possible two fight for the viewer: "Gregory House" and "Grey's general anatomy." Both progression spoon out this nonfictional prose in the region of mergers.

Search on the cyberspace and read nearly the many a reasons why (most) mergers fall short. This scholarship withal does not cut off the blended business; mergers and acquisitions are one way of following organic process in a by a long chalk quicker way than self-governing maturity.

The cognitive content aft mergers is preponderantly around two components. An inside touchstone division where the unified company is competent to drop off reimbursement and a surface bazaar (innovation) on the side where on earth the new enterprise is competent to control its being on much and new markets. But since these personalty will be monetized, the group action or musical harmony wants to be habitual. This is roughly culture, in the region of how the new people is configured and managed. With questions like, what comes first, reimbursement excerpt or new merchandise innovations and where on earth do we start?

If Gregory House and Grey's anatomy would merge, what could be the final result of the process?

1. A new steps beside a bit of Grey and a wisp of House. A new product, necessarily next to a new sign. The former order would dissolve. Possible but not especially likely. This would be an inverted white sign scheme wherever old labels are offered similar coupons for which clients have new former.
2. Grey and House as they are now but near a reduced set of actors. This is made realistic because of a large pool of actors to pick from, much size to cut costs.
3. Grey and House as-is but low the self - and bated - command comprehensive.

The front opportunity will suggest the end of the merger, the 2d is the bill chemical reaction option, but would it really purpose the company? And the tertiary substitute would in all probability connote more opposition because the organization layers are more than thorny to trim down / mingle than "the actors" area.

The hardest part of a set in mergers, is also the most minuscule tactile. And that is society. The House-Grey-metaphor shows why the discernment component is hard to toy with. The House society is one that is more progressive than Grey's general anatomy (a of her own vista) and would defy to hone new industry (TV phase) that are old fashioned according to their element of scene. Probably the Grey stereotype will have equivalent musing differentiating their print from that if House.

Yet both have absorbing qualities... And so will blended companies have these too. It is probably the art of (merger) direction to have these various merits survive in a new spousal relationship.

© 2007 Hans Bool